Opinion

Jugtown project raises many concerns

The writer was a member of the recently eliminated Princeton Affordable Housing Board. She also founded the Latin American Legal Defense and Education Fund in 2004.

Princeton reisdent Linda Oppenheim of Not In Our Town weighs in on the council’s decision to consolidate two commissions and a board.

Dear Editor: I have served for six years on the Human Services Commission (HSC), three of…

The negatices of the proposal to consolidate boards outweigh and possible benefits of efficiency, board members argue.

Resident and community leader Marge Smith asks, Is this proposal really democracy at its best?

The public hearing will be held Jan. 22 at 7 p.m.

To The Editor: Since 2018, I have served as Council liaison to both the Civil Rights…

Princeton resident Rio Baliga experience working with the Municipality of Princeton’s Civil Rights Commission, both in the capacity of formerly chairing the municipal Youth Advisory Committee and serving as a board member for Not in Our Town Princeton, weighs in on the governing body’s proposal to consolidate two commissions and a board.

Princeton resident Maria Juega weighs in on the Princeton Council’s proposed move to consolidate two commissions and a board into one smaller advisory committee.

Residents Jo Butler and Jenny Crumiller are urging residents to consider running to serve on the governing body of Princeton.

The Princeton Council wants to consolidate two commissions and a board into one group. Fern Spruill weighs in on why this is a bad idea.

“Crucially, the plan relies on developers to fulfill its progressive ideals.  But in this overheated housing market, the profit incentive only creates a drive for more units in greater densities – at ever higher prices.” 

Letters: The new master plan has the historic preservation element the town needs.

Clifford Zink: The preservation provisions of the proposed master plan are inadequate and in some places confusing and inaccurate.