Opinion

On a recent Thursday morning at the Princeton Public Library, adults practiced English conversation with a…

Princeton should complete a preservation review before approving an “area in need of redevelopment” status.

A local constitutional law scholar weighs in on the Princeton Council’s plan to try to regulate public events.

“We outright reject any proposal that would confine protests to designated places.” A letter to the editor from the grassroots group Resistencia en Acción NJ.

A letter to the editor from Lynda Dodd
leader of Indivisible Princeton

What you can do to push for a year-round ban.

Letters – Historian and Princeton resident Sean Wilentz defends DEFEND HISTORIC PRINCETON.

Princeton resident Jane MacLennan says council members should represent and listen to all their constituents.

Leighton Newlin responds to a letter to the editor by Karen O’Connell.

In a letter to the editor, Karen O’Connell says residents who care about historic preservation in Princeton shouldn’t just be dismissed.

Commentary by the Rev. Robert Moore of the Coalition for Peace Action

In-person participation matters. So does Zoom. The Princeton Planning Board can do both, says resident Carolyn Robertson.

The proposed housing project in the Witherspoon Jackson neighborhood will displace 34 families, Princeton resident Veronica Olivares-Weber writes.

There is a real cost to the taxpayers for giving a tax break to the developer of an individual property, says Princeton resident Mike Head.

Princeton resident Maria Juega argues that a proposed redevelopment project in the Witherspoon-Jackson neighborhood will result in more gentrification and less diversity.

Letters: Resident Jane MacLennan asks whether Princeton has entered the “Garb Age.”

Letters: Resident raises questions about taxes, open space and water runoff at future Stockton Street development